<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Math on Joris Bukala | Math &amp; ML</title>
    <link>https://jorisbukala.com/tags/math/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Math on Joris Bukala | Math &amp; ML</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.153.4</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 10:00:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://jorisbukala.com/tags/math/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>High-Dimensional Sampling</title>
      <link>https://jorisbukala.com/posts/high-dimensional-sampling/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 10:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://jorisbukala.com/posts/high-dimensional-sampling/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Most of the content here I prepared for giving a talk on Bayesian inference. Some background stuff didn&amp;rsquo;t fit in the (introductory) talk itself, so this is more of a space for me to put the rest.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Below, I will discuss a few things: Firstly how Bayesian inference leads into the need to sample from high-dimensional functions. I&amp;rsquo;ll then discuss some peculiarities of high-dimensional spaces. These will be used when I discuss a few different solution methods, to explain why and when they will work or fail.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fourier Analysis for DS</title>
      <link>https://jorisbukala.com/posts/fourier-analysis/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2024 10:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://jorisbukala.com/posts/fourier-analysis/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;fourier-analysis-for-ds&#34;&gt;Fourier Analysis for DS&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;People going into Data Science as a profession tend to come from a diverse set of technical backgrounds. However, the last few years more and more come from specifically Data Science masters programs. Fourier Analysis is a topic that tends to not be discussed in these settings. I think it&amp;rsquo;s still interesting enough to dive into for a bit, both because of its interesting mathematics and because it can give a lot of insight when working with time-series data.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Impractical Time Telling II</title>
      <link>https://jorisbukala.com/posts/impractical-time-telling-ii/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2023 09:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://jorisbukala.com/posts/impractical-time-telling-ii/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This is a follow-up to the &lt;a href=&#34;https://jorisbukala.com/posts/impractical-time-telling/&#34; title=&#34;Impractical Time Telling&#34;&gt;Impractical Time Telling&lt;/a&gt; post.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id=&#34;impractical-time-telling-ii-the-practicalities&#34;&gt;Impractical Time Telling II: The Practicalities&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The plan was to do this in some downtime over the Christmas holidays, but the stars already aligned a few weeks ago. I found a Garmin Instinct 2S smartwatch in the house, and Garmin actually has a good setup (&lt;a href=&#34;https://developer.garmin.com/connect-iq/overview/&#34;&gt;called Connect IQ&lt;/a&gt;) for developers to create their own apps, watchfaces, et cetera.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id=&#34;garmin-development&#34;&gt;Garmin development&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To develop a watchface, you should install the SDK on your machine, and install packages for the specific devices that you want to emulate. It&amp;rsquo;s highly recommended to then also install a PyCharm or VSCode extension for &amp;lsquo;Monkey C&amp;rsquo;. From your IDE you can then easily start an emulator for a device to test your software during development. &lt;a href=&#34;https://developer.garmin.com/connect-iq/monkey-c/&#34;&gt;Monkey C&lt;/a&gt; is Garmin&amp;rsquo;s own object-oriented language that should make it easy to use for app development.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Knot Theory</title>
      <link>https://jorisbukala.com/posts/knot-theory/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2023 18:20:59 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://jorisbukala.com/posts/knot-theory/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;playing-with-strings&#34;&gt;Playing with strings&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Knot theory is one of those topics where you start out by asking a very simple and natural question, follow a thread (&lt;em&gt;hehe&lt;/em&gt;), then look around you and realize you&amp;rsquo;re knee-deep in at least 5 fields of math.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The central topic of interest within knot theory is - you guessed it - knots. A &lt;strong&gt;knot&lt;/strong&gt; in this context can be thought of as just a piece of string that is attached together at the ends. So if you feel like it, go and grab a piece of string lying around your house, or cut open a rubber band or whatever. It&amp;rsquo;s literally all you need.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Geometric Algebra</title>
      <link>https://jorisbukala.com/posts/geometric-algebra/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2023 17:30:52 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://jorisbukala.com/posts/geometric-algebra/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;vector-product-aesthetics&#34;&gt;Vector Product Aesthetics&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;h3 id=&#34;the-beauty-inner-product&#34;&gt;The Beauty: Inner Product&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Think back for a minute to your first Linear Algebra course: Remember how nice inner products were to compute? Try to think of how to do it off the top of your head. If it&amp;rsquo;s a bit blurry: it&amp;rsquo;s just taking each component of the vectors, multiplying them and adding all the results:
$$\mathbf{a \cdot b} = \sum_{i=0}^{N} a_i b_i$$
Calculating it gives you a scalar that says something about the angle between the two. It is as simple to do in 687D as it is in 2D.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Impractical Time Telling</title>
      <link>https://jorisbukala.com/posts/impractical-time-telling/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2023 19:51:01 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://jorisbukala.com/posts/impractical-time-telling/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;impractical-time-telling&#34;&gt;Impractical Time Telling&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You know how sometimes problems are just completely &lt;em&gt;solved&lt;/em&gt; and thus boring? Like telling the time: We used to have sundials, now we have quartz watches, digital clocks&amp;hellip; &lt;em&gt;Yawn&lt;/em&gt;. A while ago I got a &lt;a href=&#34;https://projectswatches.com/cdn/shop/files/bauhausblackhero.jpg?v=1688088927&amp;amp;width=800&#34;&gt;watch that was quite funky&lt;/a&gt;, although a bit of a challenge to read.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It got me thinking, why not &lt;em&gt;create&lt;/em&gt; a nice problem to solve by creating an impractical representation of the current time and make a watch face that can display it as reasonably as possible?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Understanding Neural Networks</title>
      <link>https://jorisbukala.com/posts/understanding-nns/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2023 19:54:22 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://jorisbukala.com/posts/understanding-nns/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;understanding-of-neural-nets-from-first-principles-brain-dump&#34;&gt;Understanding of Neural nets from first-principles: Brain dump&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So I was reading my company&amp;rsquo;s IT newsletter the other day where one of the topics was sparse modeling (&lt;a href=&#34;https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnwerner/2023/08/17/sparse-models-the-math-and-a-new-theory-for-ground-breaking-ai/&#34;&gt;discussing this Forbes article&lt;/a&gt;) and it got me thinking again about some things I was reading the past months, about trying to understand how and why (mainly) Deep Learning works.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h3 id=&#34;first-principles&#34;&gt;First-principles&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a way, sure we know how it works on the microscopic level of each individual neuron (activation functions, matrix multiplications, gradient descent and all that), and we also often describe it at a high level (where we tend to greatly anthropomorphize it: &amp;ldquo;the model learned to do &lt;em&gt;X&lt;/em&gt; because in all its examples it saw this object from the same angle, ..&amp;rdquo;). But there are many questions in between where it seems we never connected the dots, instead relying on empiricism, often crude observations and post-hoc justifications for choices here:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
