<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Haskell on Joris Bukala | Math &amp; ML</title>
    <link>https://jorisbukala.com/tags/haskell/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Haskell on Joris Bukala | Math &amp; ML</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.153.4</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2025 06:20:56 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://jorisbukala.com/tags/haskell/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Functional Programming Chronicles</title>
      <link>https://jorisbukala.com/posts/functional-programming/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2025 06:20:56 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://jorisbukala.com/posts/functional-programming/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The past year I&amp;rsquo;ve been dabbling in exploring some other programming languages and paradigms. This post collects some thoughts and learnings along the way. Note that this will not be a tutorial, although I will sprinkle in links to them if you are interested.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id=&#34;why&#34;&gt;Why&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As someone who never had a formal education in computer science (apart from the odd electives given in C and Lisp in university), a programming language has mostly been just a tool to implement my thoughts and algorithms and make them compile/run. After starting work as a data scientist, I quickly settled on Python to &lt;em&gt;get the job done™&lt;/em&gt; for most of my work. Compared to a lot of languages I knew up until then, it was simple and quick to get something going. It didn&amp;rsquo;t get in my way and allowed me to basically write code in English. It had an abundance of ML-related libraries which meant that for my work it was almost impossible to &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; use it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
